I am pretty sure they are snagging the radio name info from the neighbor protocol (cdp)
Robert Andrews wrote: > I am of the opinion that their fights with StarOS has soured them on > interoperability. Note that Ubiquiti does show up in the MT AP with > the correct info, so someone has figured it out, don't know if that was > with help or without. > > Robert > > Butch Evans wrote: >> On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 16:46 -0700, Damian Wallace wrote: >> >>> They likely are doing it in the vendor extensions on the packet. >> >> That has been my suspicion, but being as it isn't documented... >> >> >>> We do >>> both, the packet and SNMP. I'd gladly share our packet format with them >>> if they will share theirs with me. See what you can do Butch, >> >> I will forward this on to them and see what happens (see the probability >> formula below). >> >> >>> since I >>> get the feeling that MT has the following procmail filter installed >>> sometimes :-> >>> :0 * ^From: *...@tranzeo\.* /dev/null >>> >> >> LOL. Seems to me that the probability that a feature addition is >> indirectly proportional to the number of times I ask for it. If it's >> something I REALLY want, the inverse factor is increased by at least 1 >> order of magnitude. >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Mikrotik mailing list > Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com > http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik > > Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik > RouterOS _______________________________________________ Mikrotik mailing list Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS
