I know that's how it is, but why would a single block possibly need /64 of
addresses. Even a /96 is the entire current IPv4 space.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Butch Evans" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, January 08, 2010 10:03 PM
To: "Mikrotik discussions" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] IPv6 Question
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 22:35 -0500, Paul McCall wrote:
Are you saying that there is no more NAT ? that would stink
In some ways, I agree. The biggest problem I see with this is from a
security standpoint. I'm not sure I want all my customer base to have a
real, public IP. However, when you consider that the smallest routable
block in IPV6 is a /64 and the smallest allocation is a /48 (65k /48s),
IP space is NOT going to be a problem.
--
********************************************************************
* Butch Evans * Professional Network Consultation*
* http://www.butchevans.com/ * Network Engineering *
* http://store.wispgear.net/ * Wired or Wireless Networks *
* http://blog.butchevans.com/ * ImageStream, Mikrotik and MORE! *
********************************************************************
_______________________________________________
Mikrotik mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik
RouterOS
_______________________________________________
Mikrotik mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS
