Shouldn't we expect Airmax, nstreme, nv2, etc to cost more CPU time? If the MAC was done by the wireless interface before and now can't, it would only make sense at least.
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Butch Evans <but...@butchevans.com> wrote: > On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 15:15 -0600, Randy Cosby wrote: >> NV2 is completely different - it uses TDMA like Canopy and UBNT's new >> stuff does. Supposed to cut way back on CPU usage, allow more clients, >> remove some distance limitations, etc. In PTP uses I've tried (and >> others I've spoken to) we're seeing more consistent latency and 10-15% >> more usable bandwidth. > > So far, I am seeing MORE CPU when compared to nstreme. > >> It does not, however, replace Nstreme Dual (yet). > > Nope. I am not sure that's even on the roadmap. I don't see a good > reason to do it that way, either. Perhaps there is room to improve the > nstreme-dual setup, but tdma would not be helpful. > > -- > ******************************************************************** > * Butch Evans * Professional Network Consultation* > * http://www.butchevans.com/ * Network Engineering * > * http://store.wispgear.net/ * Wired or Wireless Networks * > * http://blog.butchevans.com/ * ImageStream, Mikrotik and MORE! * > ******************************************************************** > > _______________________________________________ > Mikrotik mailing list > Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com > http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik > > Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS > _______________________________________________ Mikrotik mailing list Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS
