Figuring that's what I would do, but didn't want to go out and test it if someone else had.
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Nov 29, 2011 1:35 AM, "Bill Prince" <part...@skylinebroadbandservice.com> wrote: > Why not do what Canopy does and just block the DHCP server port (port 67)? > > bp > > > On 11/28/2011 8:27 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: > >> Does anyone have this handy and tested to confirm it is working? I'm >> looking for rules that would be used on the customer CPE when >> bridged/wds. >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> ______________________________**_________________ >> Mikrotik mailing list >> Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com >> http://www.butchevans.com/**mailman/listinfo/mikrotik<http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik> >> >> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik >> RouterOS >> >> ______________________________**_________________ > Mikrotik mailing list > Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com > http://www.butchevans.com/**mailman/listinfo/mikrotik<http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik> > > Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik > RouterOS > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20111129/e2dcdcd0/attachment.html> _______________________________________________ Mikrotik mailing list Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS
