Thats why I was looking at nstream dual. While it is not synced it does have a very similar benefit. The issue is also that there is no more clean room in the same RF at both ends of all the links. One end will be forces to accept noise on the link. Having split RF will let me get around that issue. PtP's are 10K each. I do not have 30K to throw at this and this is just my worst site. I have others that are growing, competition that is growing, in home devices starting to use 5ghz more, etc. I would love to be able to nstream dual out of 5ghz (still clean at the cpe sides, totally dirt at the ap side) and come back on 2.4ghz (dirty at the cpe side, clean at the ap side)
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Bill Prince <part...@skylinebroadbandservice.com> wrote: > Go to a synchronized system like Canopy. > > bp > > > > On 3/10/2012 8:55 AM, Jeromie Reeves wrote: >> >> I already do something like the replacement Butch came up with. It >> will not keep working for much longer. >> Having some of the antennas still TX'n is giving me hits on >> performance. As the RF is squeezed more I >> am seeing noise as high as -70. CSMA backoff is holding down the >> links. Not sure how to make this site >> stay working past this summer. >> _______________________________________________ >> Mikrotik mailing list >> Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com >> http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik >> >> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik >> RouterOS >> > _______________________________________________ > Mikrotik mailing list > Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com > http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik > > Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS _______________________________________________ Mikrotik mailing list Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS