The PTP600 can do asymmetric frequencies (one frequency in one
direction, and a different frequency in the other direction). But if 5
GHz isn't going to cut it for you, then you might be looking for a
licensed solution.
Pick up a bunch of latency in the operation as well. Licensed link kick
butt!
bp
On 3/10/2012 4:15 PM, Jeromie Reeves wrote:
I do not see how any single band device is going to keep getting the
job done. There is about 35mhz of /clean/ 5ghz at the tower. 15 more
that is -80's and the rest is co-site rf or sees other links that are
splattering the area. Split RF would work fine as 2.4 at the tower is
very clean (a few spikes) but the cpe end of the links are not (houses
and town clusters and my own 2.4)
I currently have reduced myself to a few 5mhz and 10mhz links but I
need to get them back to 20mhz soon. To many users at
the ends of the PtP's.
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Chuck Hogg<ch...@shelbybb.com> wrote:
PTP 600's are widely available for $5k, ask Travis Johnson or Gino
Villarini.
I hate to say it, but if your area is that filled with 5GHz, MikroTik won't
cut it.
Regards,
Chuck
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Jeromie Reeves<jree...@18-30chat.net>wrote:
Thats why I was looking at nstream dual. While it is not synced it
does have a very similar benefit. The issue is also that
there is no more clean room in the same RF at both ends of all the
links. One end will be forces to accept noise on the
link. Having split RF will let me get around that issue. PtP's are 10K
each. I do not have 30K to throw at this and this is just
my worst site. I have others that are growing, competition that is
growing, in home devices starting to use 5ghz more, etc.
I would love to be able to nstream dual out of 5ghz (still clean at
the cpe sides, totally dirt at the ap side) and come back on
2.4ghz (dirty at the cpe side, clean at the ap side)
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Bill Prince
<part...@skylinebroadbandservice.com> wrote:
Go to a synchronized system like Canopy.
bp
On 3/10/2012 8:55 AM, Jeromie Reeves wrote:
I already do something like the replacement Butch came up with. It
will not keep working for much longer.
Having some of the antennas still TX'n is giving me hits on
performance. As the RF is squeezed more I
am seeing noise as high as -70. CSMA backoff is holding down the
links. Not sure how to make this site
stay working past this summer.
_______________________________________________
Mikrotik mailing list
Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com
http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik
RouterOS
_______________________________________________
Mikrotik mailing list
Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com
http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik
RouterOS
_______________________________________________
Mikrotik mailing list
Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com
http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik
RouterOS
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:<http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20120310/28d207e2/attachment.html>
_______________________________________________
Mikrotik mailing list
Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com
http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS
_______________________________________________
Mikrotik mailing list
Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com
http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS
_______________________________________________
Mikrotik mailing list
Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com
http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS
