Hi Jerry. I hadn't used IPSEC on 5.26 so I can't advise about any bugs back then that may now be fixed. Another thing is to never assume the other end doesn't also have bugs.
The only time require vs unique should come into play would be when there were more than one subnet at one end of the tunnel. (As in more than one policy with the same two end points). So changing to unique may make no difference to you. Hopefully others may have some more experience with this version and integrating with Cisco may be able to help. Regards Alexander > On 27/05/2016, at 06:45, Roy, Jerry <jerry....@toltsolutions.com> wrote: > > Hi Alexander, > > Thanks for the quick response. > > We are running 5.26 on all 750's and the firmware is 3.19. There is an > initial tunnel that has been up on these boxes to a Juniper that never goes > down. The tunnel to the Cisco was added months later and of course to > different subnet. So I see the setting in under the policy to set it to > unique. You believe that should resolve this? > > Thanks, > > Jerry Roy 949.681.5054 > jerry....@toltsolutions.com > > _______________________________________________ > Mikrotik mailing list > Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com > http://mail.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik > > Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS _______________________________________________ Mikrotik mailing list Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com http://mail.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS
