On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 08:01 +0100, Eric Charles wrote: > Hi, > The API doc reflects a trunk code snapshot. > > We will take care the next time we generate the site to generate from > the release and not from trunk. > > Do you have any issue with the trunk code? > > Thx, Eric >
I think what may confuse Bin is that since 0.7 Message is no longer a concrete class but rather an interface. http://james.apache.org/mime4j/apidocs/org/apache/james/mime4j/dom/Message.html Yes, ideally we should not publish javadocs of the development snapshots unless they are clearly marked as such. Oleg > On 24/10/2012 16:41, Bin Lan wrote: > > Dear All, > > > > So I was looking at the website api and the SVN. I realized that the > > class *org.apache.james.mime4j.message.Message > > *is missing and it prevents of running some of the classes in samples > > folder. > > > > The confusing part is that the current trunk does not contain the class > > file at all. But the website's API doc actually has the javadoc file. Even > > worse, the website's API doc is based on 0.8, which is not out yet. There > > is a lot of confusion here. > > > > Regards > > Bin > >
