On 25/10/2012 10:23, Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
(snip)
Yes, ideally we should not publish javadocs of the development snapshots
unless they are clearly marked as such.
+1
(ps: the home page marks it: http://james.apache.org/mime4j/apidocs)
Oleg
On 24/10/2012 16:41, Bin Lan wrote:
Dear All,
So I was looking at the website api and the SVN. I realized that the
class *org.apache.james.mime4j.message.Message
*is missing and it prevents of running some of the classes in samples
folder.
The confusing part is that the current trunk does not contain the class
file at all. But the website's API doc actually has the javadoc file. Even
worse, the website's API doc is based on 0.8, which is not out yet. There
is a lot of confusion here.
Regards
Bin
