> Scott, et al - > I had similar issues with clamd versus clamscan (see > lists.roaringpenguin.com/pipermail/mimedefang/2003-December/01 > 8671.html) > but nobody else seemed to (or at least, nobody responded) and > I gave up due to lack of time. (Figuring, "I've got a > solution that works for my current mail load, why fsck with it...") > > Ole > --
I'm tempted to take the same route, except for the fact that I noticed the filter time has gone up dramatically: Random cut/paste with clamd Jan 28 00:24:01 linux1 mimedefang[11848]: i0S8O0R5011847: Filter time is 136ms Jan 28 00:27:03 linux1 mimedefang[11865]: i0S8R3i4011864: Filter time is 170ms Jan 28 00:27:15 linux1 mimedefang[11877]: i0S8RFG8011876: Filter time is 213ms Jan 28 00:33:49 linux1 mimedefang[11899]: i0S8XnOI011898: Filter time is 214ms Random cut/paste with clamscan Jan 28 07:28:14 linux1 mimedefang[13723]: i0SFRqHI013722: Filter time is 1823ms Jan 28 07:29:39 linux1 mimedefang[13728]: i0SFTb1c013727: Filter time is 765ms Jan 28 07:41:55 linux1 mimedefang[13771]: i0SFfsAG013770: Filter time is 1397ms Jan 28 07:52:26 linux1 mimedefang[13826]: i0SFqPxB013825: Filter time is 1211ms Jan 28 07:58:18 linux1 mimedefang[13854]: i0SFwG2L013853: Filter time is 1112ms _______________________________________________ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang