On Tue, 11 May 2004, Andrew Jayes wrote: > I do take your point and agree with you. But I am also aware that a > most of our mail comes from the general public and small companies > that do not have much in the way of anti-virus know how. In these > instances it would be nice to inform them to check their systems.
No, it's a terrible idea. We routinely get 5-10 of these "polite" messages per day. Our Bayesian filters are trained up to reject them, because they're absolutely useless. (We do not run Windows.) > Also > if I can inform the sender that the message has not reached us, it > saves me some earache a week later when they phone to complain that I > haven't replied. Then use action_bounce to return a 5xx SMTP failure code. Regards, David. _______________________________________________ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang