James Ebright wrote: > On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 16:17:45 -0600, Ben Kamen wrote > It doesnt sound Kosher to me... but... I have to ask.. why is your server not > sending him a FQDN that resolves correctly in DNS as the HELO?
It's a norton anti-virus gateway sitting behind a firewall. Right now, it just hands out it's hostname to the server it's talking to. I'm not even sure we can change the items in question... I'm going to issue a fix to the customer to help him absolve the problem for good in the future.. but now I'll have to set up a static mapping through the firewall and make sure all the hostnames match up as this "new rule" everyone's implementing seems to be quite picky. And that's never a good thing.
Meanwhile, the admin of the system in question already told me this was a set of rules they implemented a couple weeks ago. Thus the reason this one particular route just broke...
I pointed out to him that it does indeed break RFC1123... we'll see how it goes from there.
-Ben
_______________________________________________ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list MIMEDefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
