Kenneth Porter wrote: >> Our (commercial) implementation of greylisting notes when a host >> makes it past the greylist hurdle. Once that happens, we don't greylist >> that host for 40 days.
> While I can see how that helps a large userbase, I don't see how it > would help a small company server. It helps a lot, because you quickly build up a list of servers for companies you correspond with often, and for large domains like hotmail.com and aol.com. Suppose you correspond with 10 people at CompanyA. Once *one* person has passed the greylist test, all 10 of them can communicate with any one of you without any greylisting delays. > Perhaps a distributed greylist DB? > Sort of like a DNSBL but with white-listing. MD could store the > successful entries in a zone and we could publish our zones for others > to use. That's an excellent idea! I might think about doing it... Regards, David. _______________________________________________ NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it. Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com MIMEDefang mailing list MIMEDefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
