On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 03:33:38PM -0800, Gary Funck wrote:
> OK, and what about the question raised as to how incoming mailers
> might react if, for example, tempfailed at HELO time, and related
> questions?

I asked that merely out of curiousity, since it's not common to reject
after HELO, so it's probably not well tested. It's not a requirement for
integrating the patch (but if it causes surprising interaction with
other mail programs, that might be worth documenting).

It's good that mimedefang offers a more complete interface to the milter
API... only xxfi_abort and xxfi_close left to do (and I do see some good
use for those, so with any luck I'll add support for them later on).

-- 
#!perl -wpl # mmfppfmpmmpp mmpffm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
$p=3-2*/[^\W\dmpf_]/i;s.[a-z]{$p}.vec($f=join('',$p-1?chr(sub{$_[0]*9+$_[1]*3+
$_[2]}->(map{/p|f/i+/f/i}split//,$&)+97):qw(m p f)[map{((ord$&)%32-1)/$_%3}(9,
3,1)]),5,1)='`'lt$&;$f.eig;                                # Jan-Pieter Cornet
_______________________________________________
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
message, it is NULL AND VOID.  You may ignore it.

Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com
MIMEDefang mailing list MIMEDefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang

Reply via email to