Philip Prindeville wrote: >> But it breaks existing filters; we need the helo arg back. >> And there's a good reason to pass HELO in filter_sender (and >> filter_recipient, for that matter): You may WANT to defer your >> HELO processing until later. Our commercial products, for >> example, let individual recipients decide if they want to use >> various rules, which means we need to defer all processing >> until at least RCPT.
> That's got to get hairy when you have multiple recipients specified. It's hairy, but manageable. Doing per-recipient content-filtering is a lot hairier and less managable; we have to use hacks like stream_by_domain or stream_by_recipient. Unfortunately, that's just how SMTP works. Regards, David. _______________________________________________ NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it. Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com MIMEDefang mailing list MIMEDefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang