Matthew Schumacher wrote:

> Here is a thought, what about declaring which users accepted and which
> rejected in the rejection message.  So if recipient A wants everything
> tagged and recipient B wants spam rejected, then we reject the message
> with "Recipient B thinks this is spam (message was delivered to other
> recipients)" then in filter_end we queue the message for recipient A.

[...]

> Do you think this will work?

In one sense, it will work.  However, in a very important sense, it will
fail miserably.  Most senders don't have a clue how to interpret a DSN,
even assuming their mail server preserves the text of the DSN.  You'll
be flooded with support queries.

Regards,

David.
_______________________________________________
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
message, it is NULL AND VOID.  You may ignore it.

Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com
MIMEDefang mailing list MIMEDefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang

Reply via email to