Matthew Schumacher wrote: > Here is a thought, what about declaring which users accepted and which > rejected in the rejection message. So if recipient A wants everything > tagged and recipient B wants spam rejected, then we reject the message > with "Recipient B thinks this is spam (message was delivered to other > recipients)" then in filter_end we queue the message for recipient A.
[...] > Do you think this will work? In one sense, it will work. However, in a very important sense, it will fail miserably. Most senders don't have a clue how to interpret a DSN, even assuming their mail server preserves the text of the DSN. You'll be flooded with support queries. Regards, David. _______________________________________________ NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it. Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com MIMEDefang mailing list MIMEDefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang