On 8/25/2010 5:59 AM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > There is no such thing as 'the LGPL', and it matters which version. > Version 2.1 (which seems the relevant version) requires you to > distribute source code in its clause 4, and so does LGPL-3. > > But note that similar requirements (from GPL-3) already apply to > libstdc++.dll: see e.g. this thread > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2004-06/msg01123.html
(I am not a lawyer.) libgcc and libstdc++ both bear additional exception clauses that, under any but the most strict reading, allow you to redistribute the DLL under your own terms (e.g. without source code). -John E. / TDM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Sell apps to millions through the Intel(R) Atom(Tm) Developer Program Be part of this innovative community and reach millions of netbook users worldwide. Take advantage of special opportunities to increase revenue and speed time-to-market. Join now, and jumpstart your future. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-atom-d2d _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
