Ruben Van Boxem wrote: > Apologies for the double email, but it seems I forgot half of the community... > > Please reply-to-all so everyone is able to follow the discussion. Thanks! > >> >> My original submission with the patch is here: >> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2011-06/msg00066.html >>
I'll be interested in what Kai has to say in this posting. It seems Paolo has referred to the "maintainers of the Cygwin / MinGW ports and Kai is the MinGW maintainer of choice referred to. Myself, I would love to see wide character support finally make it into libstdc++. -- Earnie -- http://www.for-my-kids.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
