Hi Kai! On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Kai Tietz <ktiet...@googlemail.com> wrote: > So, I made spinlocks "fair" by revision 5274. This means that no > threads get *lost* on scheduling, if lock is requested.
This is purely a matter of multi-threading curiosity on my part. How much additional cost (if any) do you think fairness adds? > Thanks in advance, > Kai As always, thanks for all of your great work. K. Frank ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public