On 18 July 2013 23:54, dw wrote: > >> you are changing Interlocked*() calls to system DLL >> functions into inline functions > > This is true. If you are using x86, non-underscore versions (ie > InterlockedExchange vs _InterlockedExchange) of these 6 functions. > >> I hope this is disabled by default / __MINGW_INTRIN_INLINE is undefined >> by default. > > Why? What problems do you envision? Well, I expect that if the function does exist and MS' headers bind to it as well, so should the Mingw headers. My opinion is that the Mingw Win32 API headers should follow MS' where possible.
> >> To me this looks like trading future proof solution for speed. > > Since MS has omitted these functions from the x64 version of > kernel32.dll and replaced them with inline versions, I'm not clear what > future problems you are expecting. TBH, I did not know that and I am surprised by this. Given this, I retract my objection. -- VZ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds. Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
