Anything to reduce mingw fragmentation would be good for new users. For
example, see


http://stackoverflow.com/questions/24581842/mingw-w64-vs-tdm-gcc-vs-othes-minor-distros-e-g-mingw-distro-nuwen-net

2015-05-29 7:39 GMT+03:00 Prasanna V. Loganathar <p...@prasannavl.com>:

> Hi,
>
> I had been using the builds as a part of MSYS2 for a while now, and I
> believe this is the most robust and easiest way to install mingw-w64. Also,
> due to the inherent nature of the system, it also provides the most
> up-to-date builds on par with the Linux builds.
>
> The build I see on winbuilds is actually older than the one on MSYS2. I’m
> just wondering if it would be in the best interests of the entire community
> that MSYS2 be promoted as the preferred build from the website instead of
> winbuilds. While win-builds seem to provide a GUI and switchable toolchain,
> MSYS2 just feels a lot more robust with, especially pacman. Pacman
> integration at its crux, seems to be the most brilliant package management
> strategy for windows, so far.
>
>
>
> By the looks of the websites, I believe I can assume that the maintainers
> of winbuilds and mingw-w64 are the same or perhaps at the least linked. But
> I would very much like to think that it would be better to focus the
> efforts on one if so, and perhaps may be even implement winbuilds over
> msys2’s excellent convergence work. But until then, I think it may make a
> lot more sense to converge with MSYS2 for official sources, rather than use
> the winbuilds system. Windows GCC (MinGW) builds of libraries have
> historically been a pain, because of the numerous different possible
> configuration the default build could have had, and due to the nature of
> the various sources, and none to be so-called “official” (or at-least a
> de-facto standard). Having winbuilds, and MSYS2 could again promote such
> problems, while converging them could very easily become the de-facto
> standard.
>
>
>
> I’d like to hear what the maintainers’ thought are on these.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Prasanna V. Loganathar
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mingw-w64-public mailing list
> Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public

Reply via email to