On 04/01/2016 01:25 PM, Jacek Caban wrote: > Hi Hugo, > > On 04/01/16 13:14, Hugo Beauzée-Luyssen wrote: >> >> I agree, that's the better solution on the paper. >> However, I had quite a few symbols that I didn't manage to find the >> callsite for, so I assumed it was ok to suppress the call, just like >> it's done for GetModuleHandle. > > I'd say that it could be ok, depending on the context. Since you have > access to everything that's linked, it shouldn't be too hard to find > callers. And if you didn't find them, then how can you ensure that > returning the error won't make the whole thing useless or even buggy in > runtime? > > Cheers, > Jacek > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Transform Data into Opportunity. > Accelerate data analysis in your applications with > Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library. > Click to learn more. > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785471&iu=/4140 > _______________________________________________ > Mingw-w64-public mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public > Fair point, that was actually the case. Please disregard this patch.
Regards, ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
