On 2017/1/23 9:08, David Wohlferd wrote:
> Hmm.
>
> It seems a bit backwards to have the function that takes a 'long double'
> calling the function that takes a 'double.' Yes, they are both the same
> size on ARM, but I think I would have gone the other way. Plus I kinda
> like having all the implementations in one file (fmal.c).
I prefer that too. At the moment I have to follow what mingw-w64 has
been doing. That is, keeping separated functions for {f,,l} in different
files.
> Other than that, this looks ok to me. Building for ARM with clang seems
> to work (although I have no way to run it).
Thanks for testing.
--
Best regards,
LH_Mouse
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
