A cast via union looks like this:
type1 *foo(const type1 *my_const_ptr)
{
union {
  type1 *t1;
  const type1 *ct1;
} v;
v.ct1 = my_const_ptr;
return v.t1;
}

The advantage of such a pattern is that no type conversion
errors/warnings are shown.  So for casting from const to none-const,
this variant is to be preferred.  (and it works for C, and C++!!!)

Cheers,
Kai

2017-04-05 15:51 GMT+02:00 Mateusz Mikuła <mati...@gmail.com>:
>> Hmm, using here "wchar_t *" as cast looks wrong.  Actually we should
>> use anyway PUWSTR_C instead.
> I noticed it a bit too late and sent another patch casting to PUWSTR_C.
>> Nevertheless we can have here a const/none-const conversion (means
>> const specifiers for C-runtime function isn't regarded right?).  I
>> would suggest to introduce a union-cast instead to avoid further
>> warnings instead.
> Conversion from const pointer to normal pointer is definitely unsafe but
> that's probably what GCC just did.
> I'm unsure what you mean by "union-cast" but you can commit your fix.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Mingw-w64-public mailing list
> Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public

Reply via email to