2017-06-22 18:41 GMT+02:00 Lev Serebryakov <l...@serebryakov.spb.ru>:
> On 22.06.2017 16:17, Kai Tietz via Mingw-w64-public wrote:
>
>> Be welcome.  Well, actually gcc has one paragraph about this.  You can
>> find it in gcc's extend.texi. It is part of the item 'format
>> (@var{archetype}, ...' about attributes.
>   I've looked at GCC online documentation :) It mention ms_* but not
> gnu_* for mingw target.
>
>   One more question: looks like PRId64 and others from <inttypes.h> are
> always "I64", am I right? Is it possible to get ISO-standard defines for
> int64_t/uint64_t?

You should take another look.  We actually do this.  See our internal
headers _mingw_print_pop.h and _mingw_print_push.h for this magic

>   I've checked and both _POSIX_C_SOURCE=1 and __USE_MINGW_ANSI_STDIO=1
> don't affect this define.

It should, at least the latter one should show effect. Of course you
need to define it before including inttypes.h

> --
> // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov

Regards,
Kai

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public

Reply via email to