On Monday 20 February 2023 19:25:22 Pali Rohár wrote: > On Tuesday 03 January 2023 11:06:26 Nick Clifton wrote: > > Hi Pali, > > > > > Hello! I would like to remind this thread for gcc/binutils developers. > > > Most of these issues are still present and cause problems for compiling > > > native PE binary. If you have questions or you need any other information > > > please let me know. > > > > Have bug reports been filed for the individual issues ? If not, please > > could they be created. The URLs for filing bugs are: > > > > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi?product=binutils > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi > > > > It would *really* help if the bug reports include a simple test case > > to reproduce the specific problems. > > > > If it is not clear which tool is the source of the problem, then I would > > suggest choosing the binutils first. If it turns out that specific issue > > is actually caused by a problem in gcc, the bug report can always be moved > > later on. > > > > Cheers > > Nick > > > > Hello! Just for a record, I filled individual issues to bugzilla: > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30004 > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30139 > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30140 > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30141 > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30142 > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30143 > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30144 > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30145 > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108849 > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108851 > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108852
Hello! Should I do something more regarding these issues? _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
