On Tuesday 09 May 2023 22:29:31 LIU Hao wrote:
> Our conclusion is that, in order to reduce possible UCRT dependency, moving
> inline definitions out of headers makes sense; but the other part, such as
> duplication of functions, will not be accepted.

Ok, so does it mean that the one change with title "crt: Add non-inline
variant of UCRT _scprintf, _snprintf and _snscanf functions" is fine for
you? Or do you need some modification of it?


_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public

Reply via email to