On Thursday 29 February 2024 22:07:40 LIU Hao wrote:
> 在 2024-02-29 04:25, Pali Rohár 写道:
> > On Tuesday 09 May 2023 22:29:31 LIU Hao wrote:
> > > Our conclusion is that, in order to reduce possible UCRT dependency, 
> > > moving
> > > inline definitions out of headers makes sense; but the other part, such as
> > > duplication of functions, will not be accepted.
> > 
> > Ok, so does it mean that the one change with title "crt: Add non-inline
> > variant of UCRT _scprintf, _snprintf and _snscanf functions" is fine for
> > you? Or do you need some modification of it?
> 
> Sort of - but first, I would like to hear about what issue it can solve for 
> you.

The point is that this one change allows to have object file with
function calls to _scprintf or _snprintf to be CRT independent.


_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public

Reply via email to