On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Devendra Narayan wrote: > Yes, it is. But, in cases, like ours, where we provide both http and ftp data > it would be a waste to copy the dist twice ( once from apache-site and > once from apache-dist ). Thus, for pure ftp users, we only provide the > data mirrored from the apache-dist module. And I exclude dist when > mirroring the apache-site module.
you don't need to - the apache-site includes the dist area. so you can either create one area which is visible to both ftp and http (which we do). or you can mirror the whole apache-site area and exclude the dist area, which you can separatly mirror to the right area, or if you have enough disk space (though i wouldn't do this), you can just use rsync locally to keep a separate ftp area of the dist area. > In any case, the inconsistency in the URLs displayed ( and real ) on the > Apache mirrors page still remains !! this, i agree with. regards, -jason
