On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, jason andrade wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Sep 2001, Henk P. Penning wrote:
> >
> > Isn't there someone with an ounce of brains to organise this ?
>
>
> a few of us have been asking this for more than a year now - perhaps
> not quite like that. andrew kenna has come on board recently and
> started to help - i think that the apache group (well, brian and ask
> who seem to reply more often than most on this list) just don't have
> enough time to address this. there appear to only be around half
> a dozen `active' mirrors in terms of commenting on the list. does
> that mean the consensus is that the majority think the current setup
> is fine and the rest of us are wasting time debating it.
Lots of people don't comment, because the problem is a long standing one,
and we haven't seen any real reaction from the apache people to the
complaints raised here. It is beyond my understanding, how a very good and
successful open source project with the backing of firms like IBM can show
such a total incompetence in dealing with a mirror structure.
Apache guys! PLEASE DO SOMETHING WITH THE MIRROR STRUCTURE! Don't
start lengthy discussions about what would be the 'optimal' way of
mirroring! Almost anything is better than the current situation!
Most importantly: HAVE SOMEONE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MIRROR, who is on list
list.
Yours: Laszlo
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Laszlo L Tornoci Inst Pathophysiology
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Semmelweis Univ Med School
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Nagyvarad ter 4.
fax: (36-1)-210-4409 Budapest, H-1089, Hungary
----------------------------------------------------------------------
