On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 10:50:09PM -0500, Rene Rivera wrote: > jared r r spiegel wrote: > > this probably doesn't matter, but what if you just change the > > options to be a simple (rw) or (ro)? perhaps those options > > only apply on the server side and are therefore not communicated > > over to the 192.168.0.3 client, but .. ? > > Tried it, doesn't help :-( > > > any chance of making the linux allow nfs v3 and trying that, > > if only to see if you get the same error? > > I don't know how. There's nothing in the man pages that mentions the nfs > version, so my guess would be v2 is all it can do. > > Of course the most frustrating aspect of all this is that neither side > is very informative as to what is going on.
have you tried mounting it without the -2 argument?
