Hi, Daniel Villarreal wrote on Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 10:54:52AM -0400:
> OpenBSD is indeed about correctness, that's computer code, so that's > pretty much cut-and-dried. Human language, on the other hand, is not > so cut-and-dried. The language in OpenBSD is correct when jmc@ and nick@ like it, and still like it after having heard the other opinions. That definition pretty reliably gives us a nice, consistent style. I'd suggest to close this particular discussion with that finding, or it *might* slowly drift off-topic. ;-) Yours, Ingo
