On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 6:44 AM, Nick Holland <n...@holland-consulting.net> wrote: > On 10/01/11 23:08, Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote: >> Not again people, please. >> >> Stop feeding. > > Yes. > Yet another never-heard-from-before-or-again loser (and *always* using a > gmail account...isn't that interesting?) posting a link to that loser's > site (which is hosted on google, and MX records point to google). B $0.50 > says it's the same loser who writes that dribble and posts the link here. > > And then a bunch of people who should know better jump all over him, not > unjustifiably, but include the link of the crap in their reply, giving > more advertising to the site and higher search engine ratings. B Mission > accomplished. > > IF you have to reply to someone posting a stupid link (even an > UNINTENTIONALLY stupid link...you know, the well-intended ones that > provide baaaaddd advice), do the world a favor and remove the link from > your reply...
That guy must know a lot about security for sure. He has fcb account (find that, don't want to make PR for him) so real guru :-) It turns his complaints about security, FBI, backdoors and other stuff in to really high level joke :-) In the end his page has title which says enough how "serious" are all his post. BTW did not find his name in cvs@, tech@, misc@ so I'm curious with what he contributed to code as he writes about that. Maybe some invisible improvement? :-) > > Nick.
