keeps looking for library c.60.1 which does not exist in a vanilla 5.0 install.
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Nick Holland <n...@holland-consulting.net>wrote: > On 12/19/11 14:39, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2011-12-19, Richard Thornton <thornton.rich...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Do a simple clean 5.0 install. One would assume any browser package in > the > >> packages folder would install. None do for me on sparc, but with a clean > >> 4.9 install all 4.9 packages install. I am not a Unix specialist by any > >> means but I do know how to type pkg_add . > > > > Please send a mail to ports@ detailing exactly what you are doing (what > > you're typing, what PKG_PATH is set to if you're using it, the contents > > of /etc/pkg.conf if you're using that) and what output you see. > > > > This is the first I've heard of any major problem with 5.0 release > > packages on any arch, if there is a problem obviously we need to know > > what went wrong so we can avoid it happening in future, but before > > digging into that we need to first rule out incorrect procedure. > > Don't bother, he's doing something very wrong. This is a PEBKAC > diagnostic issue, not an OpenBSD issue. > > Just happened to have a blade100 (the machine he named) sitting here, > just loaded it up, but not into production yet, so blew it away (it was > at -current, of course) and did exactly what he said: > > * simple 5.0 install from CD (only non-default was to use ntpd) > * set PKG_PATH to my local mirror > * pkg_add xxxterm > * pkg_add firefox36 (didn't seem to be newer ones for sparc64) > * pkg_add dillo > * pkg_add conkeror > * pkg_add midori > * pkg_add kazehakase > * pkg_add links+2.2p2 > * pkg_add elinks > * pkg_add w3m-0.5.3 > * pkg_add links FINALLY! an error! conflict with links+. Package > management system worked fine :) > > Other than links after links+, all installed fine. > > Starting them all at the same time on a blade100 with only 512M RAM was > not my most productive move, but they all seemed to be trying to work, > until something ran out of something and X blew me back to a command > prompt :) > > (I gotta play with some of these alternate browsers) > > Personally, I think he's screwing up between sparc and sparc64. He's > being VERY sloppy with the platform name_s_ in his posting, so I suspect > it is safe to assume he's doing that elsewhere. > > Nick.
