On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Paul Dejean <p...@officegps.com> wrote: > Well I applied this patch to my own kernel(s): > http://www.am.torun.pl/~ja/openbsd/process-privacy.shtml > > However I don't know anything about the internals of OpenBSD.
http://atmnis.com/~proger/openkyiv/openkyiv2009_proger_sys.pdf By > applying this patch to I actually prevent untrusted users from > obtaining this information? Or do I merely obscure their ability to > obtain this information? > > On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 12:50 AM, Ted Unangst <t...@tedunangst.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 02, 2012, Paul Dejean wrote: >>> I'll start working on a patch (even though it'll take me forever) if I >>> can be confident it wouldn't be vetoed because people don't like the >>> concept. >> >> It shouldn't take long at all. B You are looking for the >> sysctl_proc_args function in sys/kern/kern_sysctl.c. B That said, I >> don't think the idea is super popular.
