Let's not crosspost replies, misc is more suitable for this one. CCs trimmed.
On 2012/02/14 08:09, Peter van Oord van der Vlies wrote: > Hello, > > Why replacing bind ? The version we have is in need of an update. Due to some of the design decisions made for BIND 10 that's not really going to be suitable for inclusion in base so even if we were to update to a newer BIND 9 now, we'd still need to look elsewhere in future, so considering that something fairly suitable is already available, imho rather than update BIND (which is not just a simple task of importing the code, we have quite a few local changes which can't be applied directly), it makes more sense to move directly there,
