On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Jiri B <ji...@devio.us> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 08:35:03AM +0100, Tomas Bodzar wrote: >> The question is if there's real potential in that for some really new >> stuff. Personally I think that developers which hacks in their free >> time work on needed features anyway even without GSoC and probably >> don't have free summer because of that and regular job (but probably >> money from GSoC may be of some use for them as for anyone). Then >> there's quality - OpenBSD model proved during years that really only >> skilled people (or those which want to be skilled) are getting inside >> dev team and we can use high quality results of that. Seems like >> OpenBSD has much more higher standards for quality of code, >> documentation and skills of programmers then GSoC can offer most of >> the times. > > If anybody knows coding and has freetime, then ipv6 for portmapper and > thus later nfs :) As OpenBSD does have NAT64 and other nice ipv6 > features by default, it would be nice to have network filesystem :)
You know that feature is filesystem in cloud where you can access your data via social interface :P :D > > jirib
