On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Siju George <sgeorge....@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 2:45 AM, Theo de Raadt <dera...@cvs.openbsd.org> > wrote: >> They started the fork because they got kicked out because one >> developer (Marco) hired 5 other developers for his startup company, >> and attempted to hire around 10 other developers in a sneaky and >> underhanded way. > > What about > > http://aeriebsd.org/about.html > > ?
Copyright and pages from about 2008 - 2010 and in CVSweb files modified before 3 years as last and so on? Seems like one of tens of projects which start because someone thinks that just because he can fork automatically must mean that it's really needed which is wrong and there's a lot such forks in Linux world leading to nowhere. Same for Bitrig - at least forum and bugs. No change for 3 weeks or so. Even in projects not paying so much attention to PR like OpenBSD or DragonflyBSD is a lot of changes during that time. Sure everyone is free to do what he likes, but for some things you need to have focus if you want to have results and OpenBSD project is showing already for many years that they have focus and can stay on line. I don't think (just my opinion) that OpenBSD project is against changes which Bitrig want to implement, but OpenBSD want them documented, in quality and free. It's doable, but takes time and a lot of times some feature were last in OpenBSD, but when it arrived it was superb when comparing with other implementations which were already for some time on "market". > > Thanks > > Siju
