On 11/29/12 06:42, Tony Berth wrote: > Thanks > > Both i386 and amd64 fail! But, are that many differences between stable and > current?
You caught us, nothing has changed in OpenBSD since 1995, we just drink beer and increment the version number every six months. </sarcasm> The most significant changes tend to take place just AFTER unlocking of a new version of OpenBSD -- i.e., BEFORE the CDs ship. So yes, -current is significantly different than the most recent release. Now, step away from the "!" key, and lets see if we can help you help us help you. Here's the situation... apparently, no one has been installing OpenBSD on this particular machine before. Never heard of it myself, whatever that means. A quick google showed me a lot of PDF files I don't wish to look at, but apparently it is a rack-mount server. There's apparently a problem between this machine and OpenBSD. You have three choices I see: 1) provide one or two of these machines to developers. 2) provide useful information to developers 3) give up, as without either 1 or 2, we aren't going to be able to help you. I'm going to guess you don't have the spare money/machine to provide a few machines to the project. The first piece of useful information we could use would be a COMPLETE dmesg, collected via a serial port as an install kernel boots. So, grab a null modem cable and another computer, and gather that for us...then maybe we can give you some suggestions. The dmesg tells us what is in your machine, how it is connected, and sometimes, an idea of what went wrong. Nick. > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Michał Markowski > <markows...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> 2012/11/29 Tony Berth <tonybe...@googlemail.com>: >> > s a fresh install! I couldn't find a CD image for current or did I >> > miss something? >> >> Try latest snapshot, e.g. >> http://ftp.icm.edu.pl/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/i386/ (or amd64, you >> didn't specify) >> >> -- >> Michał Markowski
