Thanks Paul. In that case I guess it would be simpler to do the sp kernel first since the make install causes it to get booted. Then when I do the mp kernel and install it everything will be ready to build the rest with the mp kernel.
/jl On Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 11:45:03AM +0100, Paul de Weerd wrote: > On Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 10:04:04AM +0000, John Long wrote: > | The last time I followed the FAQ compiling kernels was on single processor > | machines. I just installed OpenBSD on my daily driver dual core Intel > | box. The kernel, userland, and xenocara compiles ran fine as usual. Then I > | realized DOH! I was running the sp kernel since I never had a machine where > | I needed the MP kernel before. I built the MP kernel and installed it. > | > | If I am following stable and want to have sp and mp kernels what order > | should I compile them in, does it matter? > > Doesn't matter. They're built in separate directories and do not > interact (unlike the config file for them, where GENERIC.MP sets some > MP stuff and otherwise simply includes GENERIC, see [1]). > > Cheers, > > Paul 'WEiRD' de Weerd > > [1]: > http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/~checkout~/src/sys/arch/amd64/conf/GENERIC.MP?rev=1.10;content-type=text%2Fplain > > -- > >++++++++[<++++++++++>-]<+++++++.>+++[<------>-]<.>+++[<+ > +++++++++++>-]<.>++[<------------>-]<+.--------------.[-] > http://www.weirdnet.nl/ > -- ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) Powered by Lemote Fuloong against HTML e-mail X Loongson MIPS and OpenBSD and proprietary / \ http://www.mutt.org attachments / \ Code Blue or Go Home! Encrypted email preferred PGP Key 2048R/DA65BC04
