On FreeBSD, you need to rebuild the kernel (and partial world) to
enable/use IPSEC.
By default FreeBSD doesn`t support IPSEC, and enable it turn freebsd-update
useless
2013/10/30 Marian Hettwer <m...@kernel32.de>
> For FreeBSD: stay on -RELEASE and use freebsd-update(8)
> Nowadays no need to build world.
>
> --
> sent via my mobile C64
>
> > Am 30.10.2013 um 03:44 schrieb David Noel <david.i.n...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > I started playing around with FreeBSD back in the 2.2.7 days. I'd
> > describe myself as a casual desktop/workstation user. Back in the day
> > I was attracted to OpenBSD's heavy focus on security but was pulled
> > towards FreeBSD due to a good friend of mine being a FreeBSD
> > contributor ("dude, trust me, it's the way to go"). Recently I've
> > purchased a handful of servers for a software project I've been
> > working on and have started reconsidering my choice of OS's.
> > Administering a single FreeBSD workstation isn't too much of a
> > headache; I've kind of gotten used to having to rebuild kernel and
> > world every few months as security advisories are released. But now
> > that I'm administering 6 of them I'm really starting to get annoyed by
> > the whole process: rebuild kernel... rebuild world... reboot, and then
> > pray that it doesn't blow up in my face (as it often does). That got
> > me thinking about OpenBSD. Looking at the security advisories the last
> > one I see was from nearly a year and a half ago! That's pretty
> > incredible to me. Does this mean that I could theoretically have
> > gotten away with a year and a half uptime? What's the catch here? I'm
> > sorry but I'm incredulous by how good it sounds so I have to ask. For
> > me the biggest selling points of an operating system are security and
> > maintenance. I've been wowed by ZFS, but really how often do
> > filesystems need to be fsck'd? --and I never take snapshots. I feel
> > like I could do without it. UFS+J is good enough. Given my priorities,
> > does it sound like OpenBSD could be the one for me?
