On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 8:29 AM, Paul de Weerd <we...@weirdnet.nl> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 08:15:19AM -0430, Andres Perera wrote:
> | you use cat, muffin face:
> | ...
> | STTY=`stty -g`
> | echo -n "Password: "
> | stty -echo
> | cat > PASSWORD_FILE_DONT_READ_IF_YOU_ARE_OTHER_PROCESS_PLS
> | stty "$STTY"
> | ...
> | openssl -d ... < PASSWORD_FILE_DONT_READ_IF_YOU_ARE_OTHER_PROCESS_PLS
>
> Right, so you have to send Ctrl-D too... Quite unexpected behaviour
> maybe.
1. if A is a partial set of answers that don't make for interesting
exchanges but pleases the whims, A = { head -n1, awk '{print;exit}',
perl -ne 'print;exit' }
2. unexpected to naddy or who are we talking about. not sure what the
focus is. are we tailoring the script to a particular person or is
this about creating a good tool with sh?
>
> | why did i use printf or heredoc? what happens if a password contains
> | the subtring "\r" when you echo it? does "naddy" feel comfortable with
> | the brittle dependency of echo being a builtin, and does everybody
> | else?
>
> Maybe Naddy wrote his script with his use case in mind. Could be he
> doesn't have "\r" in his password (also, printf doesn't help in that
> case, but the heredoc does)
o ok as long as it's good for naddy. feels like im sucking up to a
stranger over the wire instead of discussing the fucking script, huh
>
> Why do you think the dependency is 'brittle'? echo has been a
> built-in of /bin/sh since it was imported into OpenBSD.
>
> | why are you such a retard?
>
> Mostly to annoy you ;) Why resort to namecalling anyway? That's not
> very nice... (and an insult to retarded folks around the globe)
>
> Anyway, you win. Congrats! No need to respond to my questions (but
> no problem if you do; just know that I won't reply any further on this
> (sub-)thread).
>
> Paul 'WEiRD' de Weerd
>
> --
>>++++++++[<++++++++++>-]<+++++++.>+++[<------>-]<.>+++[<+
> +++++++++++>-]<.>++[<------------>-]<+.--------------.[-]
> http://www.weirdnet.nl/
