On 29/11/2005, at 4:47 AM, frantisek holop wrote:
hmm, on Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 05:32:54PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek said that

It's even a FAQ: http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq8.html#wwwnotstd

doesn't mean it's right, does it?

The OpenBSD project does not fix the broken browsers which visit the
site, so they fix the site instead, when required.

I think it is just as likely that the site could be made "100%
compliant" and then a future browser is further broken in some way,
requiring another fix to the site.

So why not just address an issue when it actually becomes one? Seems
practical to me.


Shane J Pearson

Reply via email to