On 01/13/2015 01:26 PM, sven falempin wrote: > Dear OpenBSD users, > > Recently unbound made his way in base, pushing the complex bind/named > out for our own good. > > I would like to internally and externally solve some domain names > differently (so some service are accessible from inside and outside > without some fancy NAT or worse), I found out 'some' call this setup a > 'split-dns', often use for internal mail server. > > I also found out BIND got a feature for this and internet gossip > > << > Unbound doesn't support split-horizon DNS. It's primarily meant as a > recursive and caching nameserver, and has only limited support for > serving authoritative answers. > Of course i imagine ran two unbound with two different IP address binding .... > > I feel like I am missing something. > > If I want to manage my domain , shall I use bind on the 'main' server ? > > Best regards. > >
Split DNS is a very good reason for using bind, and its not that hard to set up. I could private email you an example. If unbound doesn't do this, it is missing one of the main reasons people and institutions run their own dns servers (whether or not they are behind nat). -- Those who do not understand Unix are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
