On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 04:33:56PM -0800, Jason Adams wrote: > Split DNS is a very good reason for using bind, and its not that hard to set > up. > I could private email you an example. > > If unbound doesn't do this, it is missing one of the main reasons people and > institutions > run their own dns servers (whether or not they are behind nat). >
I think there's a serious amount of confusion going on about the goal of unbound. It's *not* an authoritative name server. It doesn't try to be (aside from very, very simple configurations). It's a recursive caching resolver. Saying unbound is broken because it doesn't have split DNS is like saying lighttpd is garbage because it doesn't handle imap like nginx.
