> On Jul 18, 2015, at 1:52 PM, Mikolaj Kucharski <miko...@kucharski.name> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 11:44:17AM -0600, Brent Cook wrote:
>> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Mikolaj Kucharski
>> <miko...@kucharski.name> wrote:
>>> minimalisic patch as below fixed the issue for me:
>>>
>>> Index: constraint.c
>>> ===================================================================
>>> RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/ntpd/constraint.c,v
>>> retrieving revision 1.12
>>> diff -u -p -u -r1.12 constraint.c
>>> --- constraint.c 28 May 2015 21:34:36 -0000 1.12
>>> +++ constraint.c 28 May 2015 23:14:47 -0000
>>> @@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ constraint_check_child(void)
>>> &cstr->addr->ss),
>>> CONSTRAINT_SCAN_INTERVAL);
>>> }
>>>
>>> - if (fail || cstr->state < STATE_REPLY_RECEIVED) {
>>> + if (fail || cstr->state < STATE_QUERY_SENT) {
>>> cstr->senderrors++;
>>> constraint_close(cstr->fd);
>>> }
>>
>> Thank you for the in-depth analysis. I have been running this patch
>> the last couple
>> of days and have not experienced any issues as well. What say you reyk?
>
> I can confirm that I run this patch from the end of May (from the time
> when I've posted this to the misc mailing list) on amd64 and i386 and I
> don't have any issues with it. I did not test portable.
>
Thanks, I have committed your simpler patch.
