Toby Slight [tobysli...@gmail.com] wrote: > On 15 September 2015 at 18:09, Chris Cappuccio <ch...@nmedia.net> wrote: > > > > > Sounds like a bug in the brand new EFI boot blocks which affects your uefi > > firmware and not some others. It seems all of your tests are pointing in > > the > > same direction, they are not a result of differences in the kernels, > > rather, > > they are a result of some bug or bugs in the efiblocks. > > > > Do you think it's a efiblock bug for both issues (the usb installer kernel > not loading 90% of the time AND an encrypted install not fully booting)?
Sounds like it. > Why do you think the un-encrypted install and bsd.rd from an encrypted > install boot without issue? Aren't the same efiblocks used in each case? The boot blocks work in a tough environment with limited information. You're beta testing. It's fun. Chris
