On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 04:00:50PM +0100, ropers wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 07:09:58PM +0100, ropers wrote: > >> It says here <http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq4.html#SendDmesg> that one > >> should not send dmesg@ mail that's text-flow reformatted (which I > >> AFAIK gmail always does, unavoidably). > >> > >> If (for whatever reasons) the choice is between gmail-dmesgs or no > >> dmesgs, would gmail dmesgs be preferable to none (however unloved > >> their text-flow shenanigans may be)? > > On 31 December 2015 at 12:55, Erling Westenvik wrote: > > Wouldn't a simple one-liner like this do the trick? > > > > $ dmesg | mail -s "some subject" a...@b.cd > > Q: If all I have is a green herring, would eating that be better than nothing? > A: You should eat a red herring. > > (SCNR. ;-)
Guess I deserved that one. To my defence: I was simply incapable of imagine a scenario where Gmail would be the only option for sending a dmesg somewhere. But – A Happy New Year to you and everyone on the list! Regards Erling
