Chris Bennett wrote: > > This has the downside that if you add another level of indentation, you > > either have to break the alignment or change every line. > > No, that's definitely not OK at all. I sure wouldn't want to review > diff's with code changes and full of style changes also. > > > So there are a > > bunch of variants. > > > > > > style(9) seems to recommend just using tabs: > > > > > Put a tab after the first word, i.e., use ‘int^Ix;’ and ‘struct^Ifoo > > > *x;’. > > > > That can get ugly and hard to read, though. > > So I can change the code,make all that work great, following > the existing code style. And then change the style. At that point, > why bother? Better things for everyone to do.
I was never suggesting that you bother changing existing declarations.
