I know about the pledge(2) development, but systrace and pledge are not mutually exclusive. Pledge need to be used inline, where systrace can be used as a command line tool. If you remove it, many scripts that use systrace for privilege reduction will broke. Of course, you can put it on packages, but if you follow this logic, shouldn't other tools be also removed and be on packages? banner(1) for example, is kind useless. The cpan(1) pkg manager from perl also could be in packages. Same with sqlite3, I think. Or telnet, since almost no one uses it anymore. Etc.
- systrace removed? Why? arrowscript
- Re: systrace removed? Why? Luis Coronado
- not exactly (Re: systrace removed? Why?) Michal Bozon
- Re: not exactly (Re: systrace removed? Why?) Theo Buehler
- Re: not exactly (Re: systrace removed? W... Michal Bozon
- Re: not exactly (Re: systrace remove... Michal Bozon
- Re: systrace removed? Why? arrowscript
- Re: systrace removed? Why? Michael McConville
- Re: systrace removed? Why? Kevin Chadwick
- Re: systrace removed? Why? Theo de Raadt
- Re: systrace removed? Why? Kevin Chadwick
- Re: systrace removed? Why? Kevin Chadwick
- Re: systrace removed? W... Marc Espie
- Re: systrace removed? W... Christian Weisgerber
- Re: systrace removed? Why? Stuart Henderson
- Re: systrace removed? Why? Theo de Raadt
- Re: systrace removed? Why? Kevin Chadwick